Abstract
Background
Focusing on pain while completing a pain diary might have detrimental effects on pain intensity. Inverted comfort ratings might be used instead.
Methods
A fully remote app‐based registered experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of a pain vs. comfort diary on 7‐day recall ratings of pain intensity during a three‐week period. The diary included questions about past, current and expected pain or comfort. Randomization took place by the study app, thereby controlling for effects of experimenter bias.
Results
Contrary to the study hypothesis, multilevel regression showed a more pronounced decrease in 7‐day recall ratings of pain in the group who rated pain intensity daily (N = 184) than in the group who rated comfort daily (N = 205, B = ‐0.17, p = 0.034). There were no between‐group differences in secondary outcomes (comfort, depressive symptoms, pain interference, and happiness). Exploratory analyses revealed more pronounced decreases in pain intensity in participants who experienced less frequent pain in the previous six months. Correlations between pain and comfort ratings decreased from ‐0.39 at baseline to ‐0.06 after three weeks.
Conclusions
The findings do not support the potential beneficial effects of replacing diary ratings of pain intensity with diary ratings of comfort. The unexpected decreases among those who completed daily pain diaries might have been due to the inclusion of questions about expected pain. Decreasing correlations between pain and comfort ratings suggest that comfort ratings are not merely inverted pain ratings; rather, they appear to assess a domain distinct from pain intensity.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
from Wiley: European Journal of Pain: Table of Contents http://bit.ly/2X1TNVC
via IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment