Wednesday, November 13, 2019
The context of values in pain control: understanding the price effect in placebo analgesia
from The Journal of Pain https://ift.tt/2O8x8EN
via IFTTT
Sex differences in interleukin-6 responses over time following laboratory pain testing among patients with knee osteoarthritis
from The Journal of Pain https://ift.tt/3724qOG
via IFTTT
Sensitivities to Thermal and Mechanical Stimuli: Adults with Sickle Cell Disease Compared to Healthy, Pain-free African American Controls
from The Journal of Pain https://ift.tt/2XepywM
via IFTTT
Nociception Coma Scale Revised allows to identify patients with preserved neural basis for pain experience.
from The Journal of Pain https://ift.tt/2Xd4B53
via IFTTT
Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: diagnosis and initial management: summary of updated NICE guidance
from Latest headlines from BMJ https://ift.tt/33I7kpz
via IFTTT
Tuesday, November 12, 2019
Efficacy and harms of orally, intramuscularly or intravenously administered glucocorticoids for sciatica: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Abstract
Background
Sciatica can be a debilitating condition and there is limited guidance on the use of glucocorticoids administered via the oral, intramuscular or intravenous route for this condition. These represent viable treatment options in the primary care setting.
Objective
To evaluate the evidence on efficacy and harms of oral, IM and IV glucocorticoid administration for sciatica.
Databases and Data Treatment
MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO (inception to October 2018) were searched for randomised placebo‐controlled trials evaluating oral, IV or IM glucocorticoid administration for sciatica. Two authors extracted outcomes data. Continuous pain and disability outcomes were converted to a 0 (no pain/disability) to 100 (worst pain/disability) scale. Data were pooled using a random effects model. Overall quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Primary outcomes were leg pain and disability. Primary follow‐up period was the immediate‐term (<2 weeks from administration). We also considered adverse events.
Results
Nine trials were eligible. One study [n=27] provided low quality evidence of a small reduction in disability with early administration of oral prednisone (within 1 week); MD ‐13.4 [‐23.3, ‐3.5] but not for pain MD ‐2.5 [‐16.9, 11.9]. There was low quality evidence from one study [n=78] of moderate reduction in disability and small reduction in pain with early (within 72‐hours of symptom onset) single intramuscular administration of methylprednisolone acetate; MD ‐24.5 [‐38.8, ‐10.2] and ‐14.0 [‐27.4, ‐0.6] respectively. There were no immediate‐term benefits with IV administration. There is moderate quality evidence from one study [n=267] that oral prednisone doubles the risk of adverse events compared with the placebo group; RR 95% CI 2.1 [1.4, 3.1].
Conclusion
The effects of glucocorticoids on immediate‐term leg pain or disability are uncertain. Future large high quality trials are needed to resolve this uncertainty.
from Wiley: European Journal of Pain: Table of Contents https://ift.tt/32LLG2J
via IFTTT
Most of the world’s population lacks access to opioid drugs for pain control
from Latest headlines from BMJ https://ift.tt/33HxoBf
via IFTTT