Publication date: Available online 20 April 2016
Source:Clinical Psychology Review
Author(s): Jennifer Ma, Philip J. Batterham, Alison L. Calear, Jin Han
ContextSince the development of the Interpersonal Psychological Theory (IPTS; Joiner, 2005), a growing body of literature has emerged testing different aspects of the theory across a range of populations.ObjectiveThe aim of this review was to identify support for the IPTS, and critical gaps in the evidence base, by systematically reviewing current evidence testing the effects of thwarted belongingness, perceived burdensomeness, and acquired capability on suicide ideation and attempt.MethodsPsycInfo and PubMed databases were electronically searched for articles published between January 2005 and July 2015. Articles were included if they directly assessed the IPTS constructs as predictors of suicidal ideation or suicide attempt.ResultsFifty-eight articles reporting on 66 studies were identified. Contrary to expectations, the studies provided mixed evidence across the theory's main predictions. The effect of perceived burdensomeness on suicide ideation was the most tested and supported relationship. The theory's other predictions, particularly in terms of critical interaction effects, were less strongly supported.ConclusionsFuture research focused on expanding the availability of valid measurement approaches for the interpersonal risk factors, and further elaborating upon their mixed relationships with suicide ideation and attempt across multiple populations is important to advance theoretical and clinical progress in the field.
from ScienceDirect Publication: Clinical Psychology Review http://ift.tt/23LptR1
via IFTTT
Showing posts with label ScienceDirect Publication: Clinical Psychology Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ScienceDirect Publication: Clinical Psychology Review. Show all posts
Thursday, April 21, 2016
A Systematic Review of the Use of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in Chronic Disease and Long-Term Conditions
Publication date: Available online 20 April 2016
Source:Clinical Psychology Review
Author(s): Christopher D. Graham, Joanna Gouick, Charlotte Krahé, David Gillanders
Many have proposed that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) may be particularly effective for improving outcomes in chronic disease/long-term conditions, and ACT techniques are now being used clinically. However, reviews of ACT in this context are lacking, and the state of evidence is unclear. This systematic review aimed to: collate all ACT interventions with chronic disease/long-term conditions, evaluate their quality, and comment on efficacy. Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and Psych Info were searched. Studies with solely mental health or chronic pain populations were excluded. Study quality was then rated, with a proportion re-rated by a second researcher. Eighteen studies were included: eight were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), four used pre-post designs, and six were case studies. A broad range of applications were observed (e.g. improving quality of life and symptom control, reducing distress) across many diseases/conditions (e.g. HIV, cancer, epilepsy). However, study quality was generally low, and many interventions were of low intensity. The small number of RCTs per application and lower study quality emphasise that ACT is not yet a well-established intervention for chronic disease/long-term conditions. However, there was some promising data supporting certain applications: parenting of children with long-term conditions, seizure-control in epilepsy, psychological flexibility, and possibly disease self-management.
from ScienceDirect Publication: Clinical Psychology Review http://ift.tt/24420Yc
via IFTTT
Source:Clinical Psychology Review
Author(s): Christopher D. Graham, Joanna Gouick, Charlotte Krahé, David Gillanders
Many have proposed that Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) may be particularly effective for improving outcomes in chronic disease/long-term conditions, and ACT techniques are now being used clinically. However, reviews of ACT in this context are lacking, and the state of evidence is unclear. This systematic review aimed to: collate all ACT interventions with chronic disease/long-term conditions, evaluate their quality, and comment on efficacy. Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and Psych Info were searched. Studies with solely mental health or chronic pain populations were excluded. Study quality was then rated, with a proportion re-rated by a second researcher. Eighteen studies were included: eight were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), four used pre-post designs, and six were case studies. A broad range of applications were observed (e.g. improving quality of life and symptom control, reducing distress) across many diseases/conditions (e.g. HIV, cancer, epilepsy). However, study quality was generally low, and many interventions were of low intensity. The small number of RCTs per application and lower study quality emphasise that ACT is not yet a well-established intervention for chronic disease/long-term conditions. However, there was some promising data supporting certain applications: parenting of children with long-term conditions, seizure-control in epilepsy, psychological flexibility, and possibly disease self-management.
from ScienceDirect Publication: Clinical Psychology Review http://ift.tt/24420Yc
via IFTTT
Wednesday, April 13, 2016
Tuesday, April 12, 2016
Saturday, April 9, 2016
Sunday, April 3, 2016
Friday, April 1, 2016
Thursday, March 24, 2016
Wednesday, March 23, 2016
Friday, March 18, 2016
Wednesday, March 16, 2016
Friday, March 4, 2016
Thursday, March 3, 2016
Wednesday, February 24, 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)