from Latest headlines from BMJ https://ift.tt/2H7MV56
via IFTTT
Publication date: March 2019
Source: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Volume 100, Issue 3
Author(s): Diarmuid Denneny, Helena C. Frawley, Katrine Petersen, Rebecca McLoughlin, Suzanne Brook, Salma Hassan, Amanda C. Williams
To determine the effectiveness of trigger point manual therapy (TPMT) for reducing chronic noncancer pain and associated problems in adults, by analyzing all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
We searched databases and clinical trials registers from their inception to May 2017.
We included RCTs in any language that recruited patients older than 18, with pain of 3 months’ duration or more. We assessed pain, function, and patient-reported improvement as outcomes.
Two authors independently extracted and verified data. Meta-analysis was completed where possible, otherwise data were synthesized narratively.
We combined all data using a random-effects model and assessed the quality of evidence using GRADE. A total of 19 trials (involving 1047 participants) met inclusion criteria, representing TPMT treatment of musculoskeletal, pelvic, and facial pain. No effect was found for short-term pain relief (mean standardized difference −0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.08 to 0.02). One small study showed a longer-term benefit for pain (mean standardized difference −2.00; 95% CI, −3.40 to −0.60) but with low confidence in the effect. Significant gains emerged for function (mean standardized difference −0.77; 95% CI, −1.27 to −0.26) and in patient global response (odds ratio 3.79; 95% CI, 1.86-7.71) from 4 studies, but not for health-related quality of life.
Evidence for TPMT for chronic noncancer pain is weak and it cannot currently be recommended.
Publication date: March 2019
Source: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Volume 100, Issue 3
Author(s): Marcella Ferraz Pazzinatto, Danilo de Oliveira Silva, Amanda Schenatto Ferreira, Marina Cabral Waiteman, Evangelos Pappas, Fernando Henrique Magalhães, Fábio Mícolis de Azevedo
The aims of this study were threefold: (1) to compare the amplitude of patellar tendon reflex (T-reflex) between women with patellofemoral pain (PFP) and pain-free controls; (2) to compare the amplitude of vastus medialis Hoffmann reflex (VM H-reflex) between women with PFP and pain-free controls; (3) to investigate the association between the amplitude of patellar T-reflex and VM H-reflex in women with PFP and pain-free controls.
Cross-sectional observational study.
Laboratory of biomechanics and motor control.
Thirty women with PFP and 30 pain-free women aged 18 to 35 years (N=60).
Peak-to-peak amplitudes of maximal VM H-reflex (elicited via electrical stimulation on the femoral nerve) and patellar T-reflex (elicited via mechanical percussion on the patellar tendon) were estimated.
Women with PFP had significant lower amplitude of patellar T-reflex (mean difference=0.086; 95% confidence interval=0.020 to 0.151; P=.010; moderate effect) and VM H-reflex (mean difference=0.150; 95% confidence interval =0.073 to 0.227; P<.001; large effect) compared to pain-free controls. The VM H-reflex was strongly correlated with patellar T-reflex in both PFP group (r=0.66; P<.001) and control group (r=0.72; P<.001).
As the T-reflex is easier to perform than H-reflex assessments in a clinical setting, it represents a feasible option to assess the impaired excitability of the stretch reflex pathway associated with PFP.
Publication date: March 2019
Source: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Volume 100, Issue 3
Author(s): Batia S. Marom, Navah Z. Ratzon, Rafael S. Carel, Moshe Sharabi
To determine time of return to work (TRTW) in relation to multivariable predictors among male manual workers after hand injury (HI) over a 12-month follow-up.
A cohort study with baseline medical information, functional evaluation, and 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month follow-up telephone interviews.
Seven physical rehabilitation community occupational therapy clinics.
Participants (N=178) with acute HI aged 22-65. Two participants were lost to follow-up.
Not applicable.
The dependent variable was TRTW. The independent variables originated from 4 domains: personal factors, environmental factors, body function and structure, and activity limitation and participation restriction. The proportion of return to work (RTW) at each time point was calculated. Multiple Cox regressions established a predictive model for TRTW.
At the end of the study, 75.3% participants returned to work. The median TRTW was 94 days. In the final model, only compensation factors and education contributed significantly to overall RTW, but when separate analyses were performed, decreased level of self-efficacy, higher workplace demands, level of pain, level of emotional response to trauma, reduced physical capability of the hand, and higher level of disability were significantly associated with delayed TRTW.
TRTW was determined by the physical capability of the hand, pain, and psychosocial factors, but it was also affected by legal factors. Participants who did not return to work during the first 9 months are at risk for long-term disability. Developing treatment programs for those who are at risk for not returning to work, taking into consideration these factors, is recommended.
Publication date: March 2019
Source: Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Volume 100, Issue 3
Author(s): Hui-Ju Young, Tapan S. Mehta, Cassandra Herman, Fuchenchu Wang, James H. Rimmer
To investigate the effects of two 12-week exercise training interventions, movement-to-music (M2M) and adapted yoga (AY), on physical and psychosocial outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Three-arm randomized controlled proof-of-concept trial.
A community-based fitness facility.
Participants (N=81) with MS (Patient Determined Disease Steps [PDDS] self-reported disease status scores: 0-6) between ages of 18 and 65 years were randomized to M2M (n=27), AY (n=26), or waitlist control (n=28).
Both M2M and AY completed three 60-minute exercise sessions per week for 12 weeks. Waitlist controls received biweekly newsletters via mail that contained educational information on living with MS.
Primary measures were timed Up and Go (TUG, s) test, 6-minute walk test (6MWT, m), and 5 times sit-to-stand test (FTSST, s). Secondary measures were self-reported outcomes assessed using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Fatigue and Pain Interference Short Form 8a. Participants were evaluated at baseline and postintervention. Primary analyses were performed using an intent-to-treat mixed model analysis of covariance.
Comparisons across all 3 groups revealed significant group differences in TUG and 6MWT. Post hoc analyses indicated significant improvements in TUG (least square mean difference [95% confidence interval] = −1.9s [−3.3 to −0.5], P=.01, d=0.7) and 6MWT (41.0m [2.2-80.0], P=.04, d=0.6; controlled for PDDS) in M2M compared to controls, while no significant differences were observed when compared AY to controls. No significant group differences were found in FTSST, fatigue, and pain interference.
M2M may be a useful and enjoyable exercise form for people with MS in improving mobility and walking endurance and merits long-term study in larger study populations.
Classify viruses — the gain is worth the pain
Classify viruses — the gain is worth the pain, Published online: 20 February 2019; doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00599-8
Viruses hold solutions to a lot of problems, so let’s fund and reward cataloguing, urge Jens H. Kuhn and colleagues.